Provider Status: 2015 Edition

All of my pharmacy friends should be familiar with the term “provider status.” It’s a phrase that gets tossed around in all areas of pharmacy practice – but what does it really mean?

If you’re not a pharmacist or student pharmacist, I have a question for you. Would you consider your pharmacist a healthcare provider?

Believe it or not, according to the Social Security Act, pharmacists are not considered healthcare providers under Medicare. What does that mean? That means that pharmacists who provide the same services as other healthcare providers are ineligible for payment for these services. This also means Medicare doesn’t cover certain services when they’re provided by a pharmacist. This could mean that beneficiaries may have to travel hours or perhaps even across state lines to see a practitioner that can provide the services they need.

What provider status is:

  • Provider status has been introduced in both the House of Representatives (H.R. 592) and the Senate (S. 314) as the Pharmacy and Medically Underserved Areas Enhancement Act.
  • It is a bipartisan bill to increase patient access to pharmacists’ care, especially in medically underserved communities (Do you live or work in a medically underserved community or healthcare provider shortage area? Click here to find out.)
  • The fact that both of these bills have been introduced in both chambers of Congress is a great testament to the growing momentum behind the provider status movement. Last year, a bill was introduced in only the House of Representatives (H.R. 4190). After much work by pharmacists and student pharmacists across the country, there were 123 bipartisan cosponsors of the bill as of the end of 2014.
  • Provider status will help fix the problem of medication non-adherence — in total healthcare costs, that’s a $290 billion (with a B) problem — by increasing access to pharmacists, who are the medication experts.
  • With more and more Americans gaining healthcare coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), there is an increased need for accessibility to care. The Association of American Medical Colleges projects that, by 2020, there will be more than 91,000 fewer doctors than needed to meet demand, and the impact will be most severe on underserved populations. Nearly 90% of Americans live within five miles of a community retail pharmacy, making pharmacists one of the most accessible healthcare team members.
  • The goal of provider status is to increase access to care by utilizing pharmacists as an integral part of the healthcare team to optimize medication regimens and improve patient health outcomes.

What provider status is NOT:

  • Pharmacists do not seek to expand their scope of practice. Pharmacists will not be able to prescribe, they will not be able to diagnose, and they do not wish to “intrude” on physicians’ (or other providers’) respective scopes of practice. Pharmacists’ scope of practice will still be dictated by state law, not federal law.
  • Provider status will not mean that pharmacists get paid more than other providers for providing the same services.
  • You will not have to pay your pharmacist to get the same personalized care you’ve come to expect.

If you’re a pharmacist or student pharmacist, I urge you to become involved and advocate for the future of our profession. Talk to your family, your friends, your colleagues, and your congressmen. Not sure what to say? Here are the basics:

  1. Pharmacists have more medication education and training than any other health care professional.
  2. When pharmacists are included on patients’ health care teams, the quality of care increases and outcomes improve.

  3. Physicians, nurses, dieticians, chiropractors, and midwives are all recognized as health care providers.

  4. PHARMACISTS ARE NOT CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED AS HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS! YOU can change that!

If you’re not a pharmacist or student pharmacist, and have read this far: THANK YOU! The word is getting out. If you want to help, call your representatives in Washington and urge them to support S. 314 or H.R. 592. Tell them a story of how a pharmacist helped you. Explain to them what provider status really means. I’m always available to talk if you’d like more information, or if you have any questions.

We were able to convince 123 Republicans AND Democrats in Washington last year that provider status was worth it. Let’s make this continue to grow this year! Our advocacy efforts paid off, but the job isn’t done yet. Pharmacy has come a long way thanks to the men and women who came before us. We would be doing them an enormous disservice if we didn’t continue to advance our profession.

Thank you for reading.

H/T to the American Pharmacists Association, the Patient Access to Pharmacists’ Care Coalition, and the National Association of Chain Drug Stores for some of the statistics presented in this post.

2 thoughts on “Provider Status: 2015 Edition

  1. So basically HR 592 changes verbiage on CMS law allowing pharmacists to bill as providers in underserved areas. If it passes (IF), It is a very small step in the right direction, but I believe the floodgates are far from being open. How exactly is this practice changing now and in the future?

    This doesn’t change our state defined scope of practice. This doesn’t mandate that other third parties reimburse us for our services. This doesn’t change the current model of pharmacy dictated by the MBAs at CVS/WAG/RAD (at least for the 60ish % of us in retail). How can the majority of pharmacists (not the 5% in academia bankrolled by SOP tuition) realistically address the PCP gap and “provide care” with the current pharmacy paradigm? Shoot, we’re mostly too busy for adherence phone calls.

    Not a hater, just a very pragmatic pharmacy student. I want to move the profession forward and use our underutilized knowledge just as much as anyone else – but is this the right move?

    Like

    • Thanks for your comment. I absolutely think this is a step in the right direction for our profession. You might attribute my viewpoints to the fact that I work as a clinical pharmacist at an independent pharmacy, so I’m (fortunately) not subject to the MBA dictation you refer to at the national chain pharmacies. The focus of this bill is to increase access to care in medically-underserved areas. Very generally speaking, CMS policies tend to be “trend-setting” in the sense that other third parties (Express Scripts, CVS/Caremark, etc.) tend to follow suit. For example, Medicare was one of the first to pioneer the pay-for-performance model, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is constantly testing these payment models. Third party insurance companies will then use these payment models to develop their own pay-for-performance payment models that we see coming to the forefront in healthcare today.

      Is this an umbrella solution that will fix everything? By no means. But I think you’re definitely correct in saying it’s a step in the right direction, but also that our work will not be done if (when) it passes. Thanks again for reading! Best of luck as you finish school.

      Like

Leave a reply to UMB Cancel reply